The Disappearing Art of Doing Nothing

Doing nothing sounds simple until one actually tries to do it.

Sit still. Put the phone away. Do not read. Do not scroll. Do not make a list. Do not mentally draft an email, plan the week, remember the groceries, check the blood sugar reader, open a book, play a game, rearrange a thought, or wonder whether this stillness can be turned into something useful later.

Just sit.

For some people, this may sound peaceful. For me, it sounds luxurious, desirable, and almost impossible. I like the idea of doing nothing. In theory, it is sitting in a quiet room, perhaps lying down, staring into space, letting the mind settle like dust after a cupboard has been opened. But in reality, my brain does not settle. My mind behaves as if twenty browser tabs are open and one of them is playing music, usually at 2 am when I have woken up to use the toilet and should, by all logic, return to sleep.

Doing nothing is hard for me. Even when my body is still, my mind is moving. If I have a few minutes with no obvious task, my hand automatically reaches for my phone. I check social media, open a game, read Reddit, or go into my library app because if a story has hooked me, even a lift ride can become reading time. I fill small silences before they have a chance to become silence.

I do not particularly like this. But it is also part of modern life, and pretending otherwise would be dishonest.

We live in a world that has trained us to treat every gap as an opportunity. Waiting for the kettle? Check the phone. Waiting for the bus? Check the phone. Eating alone? Watch something. Sitting in bed? Scroll. Resting? Optimise the rest. Record the rest. Turn the rest into a morning routine, a Sunday reset, a wellness ritual, a slow-living aesthetic with soft lighting and a ceramic mug placed just so.

Even doing nothing, it seems, now has to work for its keep.

There is an irony in watching videos about slow living and self-care, knowing how much work must have gone into making them. The lighting, the camera angles, the editing, the captions, the music, the deliberate casualness of it all. Rest has become content. Stillness has become performance. The person filming their peaceful morning has probably spent more time arranging the shot than being peaceful.

I say this without judgment because I, too, enjoy watching such content. It is soothing in the way a clean kitchen in someone else’s house is soothing. But it also makes me laugh a little. We have become so uncomfortable with unproductive time that even leisure must be packaged, captioned, and posted.

This is perhaps why the art of doing nothing is disappearing. Not because we no longer desire it, but because we no longer know how to defend it.

As children, we had more empty time, whether we liked it or not. Growing up in Mumbai, I hated being bored. If I complained to my paternal grandmother that I was bored, she had a line in Tamil that sounded far better than any translation could manage. If I said, “Bore adikkaradu,” she would say, “Bore-a adi,” meaning “beat the boredom back”. In other words, boredom was not a crisis requiring adult intervention. It was something to be wrestled with, survived, and transformed.

Source

And we did transform it.

We read anything we could find. We invented games. We produced little plays. We pretended. We made things up. We stood on balconies and watched the world go by. I loved doing that, standing on the balcony and observing the street below. People walking, vehicles passing, neighbours talking, vendors calling out, the ordinary theatre of city life continuing whether or not one had anything to do.

There was a kind of richness in that unstructured look. No one called it mindfulness then. No one had to. It was simply what one did when there was nothing else to do.

I also daydreamed, especially at night when I could not sleep. I still do sometimes, though less often in the day now. Adult life has a way of shrinking the room available for aimless imagination. Daydreaming becomes something we squeeze between responsibilities or something that arrives only when sleep refuses to.

Children today have less of this empty time. BB and GG’s childhood still had some creativity in it. They played with dolls, board games, blocks, and toys. They were not exposed to social media very early. But once school, tuition, enrichment classes, and devices entered the picture, childhood became more scheduled. This is not unique to them. It is the rhythm of many children’s lives now: school, homework, tuition, activities, screens, repeat.

Some structure is good. Children need encouragement, discipline, and exposure. A little pressure can help them grow. But beyond a point, childhood becomes a calendar rather than a landscape. There is no time to wander. No time to invent a game out of nothing. No time to sit with boredom long enough for it to turn into imagination.

And boredom does have a purpose. It is not merely the absence of entertainment. It is where children meet themselves. It is where they learn to create, observe, wait, and think. If every moment is filled for them, they never discover what their own minds can do when left alone.

Of course, adults are not much better.

Singapore, where I live now, is a difficult place in which to do nothing. It is efficient, achievement-driven, scheduled, expensive, and always moving. There is always something to do, and often something that should have been done yesterday. Planning is rewarded. Productivity is admired. The calendar is a survival tool. Even leisure is often organised in advance.

There are still places where I can zone out. At home, when the house is quiet. At the beach or in a park. In the library. On the upper deck of a bus, sitting by the window, watching the city move past. At the airport, oddly enough, especially when I am alone. Airports are perfect places for doing nothing because everyone is between places. No one fully belongs there for long. You can sit, watch people, imagine stories, and feel suspended from ordinary time. A long-haul flight offers something similar. Once the plane takes off, life below has to wait. No errands. No chores. No immediate demands. Just time, air, and a small screen one may or may not use.

India offers a different relationship with doing nothing. The India I grew up in was noisy, crowded, and full of constant cacophony, so doing nothing was never exactly quiet. But there were natural pauses, partly because life was less efficient. Waiting was built into the day. Waiting for buses, trains, relatives, phone calls, water, electricity, and information. Power cuts forced everyone to stop. Train journeys made one look out of the window. Neighbours dropped in. People sat around. Balconies, building compounds, and street corners became informal theatres of nothing in particular.

Now, when I go to Bangalore, I still find pockets of time to zone out. But India too has changed. Everyone has a smartphone. Everyone has internet. The pause has been colonised. Whether in India or Singapore, the hand goes to the phone. The old art of sitting and doing nothing has been replaced by the new habit of sitting and consuming something.

The phone may be the greatest enemy of nothingness. It is useful, addictive, entertaining, and always available. It rescues us from boredom so quickly that we no longer learn what boredom might have given us. It makes waiting painless but also makes thinking rarer. It connects us to everyone and disconnects us from the quiet inside ourselves.

This matters because doing nothing is not always nothing.

For a writer, especially, empty time is not wasted time. Ideas often arrive when I am not chasing them. During my morning walk with my meditation app. In the shower. While cooking. Before sleep. While drinking coffee. Sometimes in the most random places and moments. Writing needs empty space. It needs the mind to loosen its grip on usefulness. It needs time when nothing obvious is being produced, because below the surface, something is forming.

I do not usually mistake thinking time for laziness. I know that thought is part of writing. But knowing this does not always remove the guilt. When life has so many moving parts: job searching, writing, income streams, blog work, Echoes of Calm, family, health, Image Mission work, there is always something that could be done. One more application. One more article. One more Canva template. One more email. One more plan. One more post. One more idea to capture before it disappears.

In such a life, doing nothing can feel irresponsible.

This is where productivity culture becomes dangerous. It teaches us that every moment must justify itself. Rest must improve performance. Hobbies must become income streams. Walking must count as fitness. Reading must contribute to growth. Writing must build a platform. Creativity must be monetised. Even a blog, which may begin as a personal space for reflection, memory, and expression, is quickly assessed through the lens of money.

For years after I started blogging, when I told people about it, I was often asked whether it made money. The question came so frequently that I eventually had to shut it down firmly. Not everything has to earn. Not every joy has to be converted into income. Not every act of expression must be weighed on the scale of productivity.

Yet I understand why people ask. We live in a world where time is money, and therefore time spent without earning, improving, networking, or producing appears suspect. Doing nothing becomes not merely a personal failure but an economic one. What did you get out of it? What did it lead to? How did it help?

Maybe it helped me remain human. That should be enough, though it often is not accepted as an answer.

Women, in particular, are rarely allowed to do nothing without judgment. A man resting is often simply resting. A woman resting is available. If she is sitting down, surely she can fold the laundry. If she has a free hour, surely she can cook something extra, organise a cupboard, call someone, supervise homework, plan a meal, reply to messages, soothe a feeling, remember an appointment, or be useful in some way.

Women are expected to fill empty space. Cooking, cleaning, organising, remembering, caring, planning, messaging, hosting, helping. Even rest can become a waiting room for the next task.

In some families, if a woman has free time, it must be explained. She cannot just sit. She must be tired, sick, upset, or lazy. Simple rest is not enough justification. This is one of the quiet injustices of domestic life. Women’s time is often treated as communal property. Everyone may draw from it. Everyone may assume it is available.

Motherhood deepens this. When BB and GG were young, I barely had time to myself. Later, as they grew older, I reclaimed more of it, but until they finished school, there was always an undercurrent of alertness. Meals, schoolwork, activities, health, logistics, emotional needs, exam schedules, transport, forms, uniforms, tuition, everything. Even when I was not actively doing something, some part of me was on standby.

That standby mode does not switch off easily. Even now, doing nothing can feel slightly suspicious, as though someone somewhere must need something.

This is why chosen stillness feels so different from forced waiting. There is a kind of nothing that is peaceful: morning coffee in a silent house, a walk without hurry, sitting at a window, watching rain. But there is also a kind of nothing that is anxious and unpleasant: waiting when there is too much work, waiting for replies, waiting for results, waiting in uncertainty, waiting while the mind chews through every possible outcome.

Chosen stillness restores. Forced waiting drains.

This distinction matters because not everyone has the privilege to romanticise doing nothing. For someone juggling multiple jobs, caregiving, financial stress, illness, or survival, rest may not be easily available. Telling people to “slow down” can sound tone-deaf when their lives do not allow it. The issue is not simply individual choice. It is also social, economic, and cultural. Some people are not restless because they lack wisdom. They are restless because life demands it.

Still, within whatever space we have, however small, we need moments that are not claimed by productivity.

Health has taught me this in its own way. Managing diabetes means paying attention to the body, even when the mind wants to keep charging ahead. I use a CGM, and scanning it is itself a morning ritual. I know that being more rested helps me manage my blood sugar better. Stress, sleep, food, movement, and rest are all connected. The body keeps its own accounts, whether or not we acknowledge them.

Perhaps doing nothing is not nothing to the body. Perhaps it is repair.

The trouble is, I am not always listening closely enough to hear that. Like many people, I wait for the body to speak loudly before I pay attention. Fatigue must become exhaustion. Stress must become numbers on a screen. The mind must become too noisy to ignore. Only then do I pause, when pausing should have come much earlier.

Midlife adds another layer. As I grow older, I feel both more entitled to rest and more anxious about time. Doing nothing can feel like reclaiming time, but it can also feel like wasting it. The years no longer stretch endlessly ahead in the way they seemed to when I was young. There is a sharper awareness now that time is finite. This can make rest feel precious, but also make it feel dangerous. What am I doing with my life? What am I not doing? What should I have done by now?

Midlife asks uncomfortable questions. One of them is: what am I rushing toward, exactly?

We hurry through days as though there will be a final clearing where everything is done and rest becomes permissible. But that clearing never arrives. There is always another task, another worry, another plan. If rest has to be earned by finishing everything, we will never rest. The list is immortal. We are not.

Perhaps the art of doing nothing disappeared because the world prioritises busyness. Busy people look important. Busy lives look successful. Busy calendars suggest demand and relevance. To say “I am busy” is almost a badge of honour. To say “I did nothing” feels like a confession.

But what are we losing when we lose the ability to do nothing?

We lose imagination. We lose patience. We lose the ability to observe without needing to capture. We lose the inner life that grows only in quiet. We lose boredom, and with it the strange creativity boredom can unlock. We lose the ability to be alone with ourselves. We lose reflection. We lose the habit of noticing beauty when it is not presented to us through a screen.

We also lose a certain tenderness towards time. Not all time has to be used. Some time can simply be lived.

I admire people who still seem able to do this. Older people sitting at void decks, shooting the breeze with no visible agenda. Temple-goers sitting quietly after darshan, not rushing out immediately after the ritual is done. Children staring into space. People sitting in parks. Someone with a cup of tea and nowhere urgent to be. These scenes stay with me because they feel increasingly rare. They are small acts of resistance against a world that asks, “What next?”

My ideal version of doing nothing is simple. Morning. I am the only one awake in the house. The room is quiet. I have a hot cup of coffee in my hand. My phone is nearby, not for scrolling, but to capture an idea if one arrives. I sit in silence. No one needs me yet. The day has not begun making its claims.

This is not dramatic. It will never trend. It cannot be turned into a productivity hack without ruining it. That is precisely why it matters.

Doing nothing does not mean abandoning responsibility. It does not mean laziness, though a part of me still carries that old conditioning. “Don’t waste time.” “Do something useful.” “Idle mind is the devil’s workshop.” “Why are you just sitting?” These phrases were common enough growing up, and I have used versions of them with BB and GG too. The inheritance continues even when we know better. We pass on not only values but anxieties.

Maybe the work now is to interrupt that inheritance.

To tell ourselves and our children that empty time is not wasted time. That rest need not be earned through exhaustion. That boredom will not destroy us. That creativity requires space. That the mind needs to wander. That the body needs to repair. That a woman sitting down is not automatically available. That a hobby does not have to become a side hustle. That not every moment must be captured, posted, measured, or improved.

The art of doing nothing is disappearing, but perhaps it is not gone. It waits in small places. In morning coffee. In a bus window. In the hush of a library. In a beach breeze. In the airport between flights. In a quiet walk. In the few minutes after lighting a lamp. In the pause after prayer. In the space before an idea becomes words.

Maybe doing nothing is not the opposite of living fully. Maybe it is what allows us to live fully.

So tomorrow morning, if the house is still quiet and the day has not yet rushed in, I hope to sit with my coffee for a few minutes longer. I will probably still reach for my phone. I am not pretending to be a saint of stillness. But perhaps I can wait before touching it. Perhaps I can let the silence arrive first. Perhaps I can allow my mind to wander without immediately making it useful.

A few minutes of nothing. Which, I am beginning to realise, may be something after all.

The Zettelkasten Method: A Quiet System for Managing Information Overload

There is a particular kind of tiredness that comes not from doing too much but from absorbing too much. You read. You save. You screenshot. You bookmark. You forward articles to yourself on WhatsApp so you do not forget. Your Notes app fills up. Your Trello boards multiply. At some point, something in you switches off. Not dramatically. Quietly.

You stop opening saved links. You skim instead of reading. You tell yourself you will “catch up” later. This is information overload. And for many of us, it does not look chaotic. It looks organised but unprocessed. Most advice focuses on consuming less. That is useful, but incomplete. The deeper question is not only how much we take in, but what we do with what we take in. The Zettelkasten method offers a different answer. Not faster consumption. Not better storage. A better way of thinking.

What Zettelkasten Actually Is
Zettelkasten is a German word meaning “slip box.” Originally, it referred to a box of index cards, each containing one idea, linked to other cards through references. But the physical box is not the point. The philosophy is simple: write one idea per note, in your own words, and deliberately connect it to other ideas. Not archive. Connect. This distinction matters. Most of us store information. Few of us build networks of thought. Zettelkasten assumes that knowledge is not static. It grows through relationships. An isolated note is a reminder. A linked note becomes part of a system. The goal is not to remember everything you read. The goal is to develop your own framework.

Why We Shut Down
When people feel overwhelmed, they often blame volume. Too many articles. Too many books. Too many podcasts. But consider this: if you read only one thoughtful essay today and never integrate it into your thinking, would you still feel unsettled? Often, the fatigue comes not from quantity but from unfinished processing. Your mind does not like loose ends. Saved articles are loose ends. Highlighted paragraphs are loose ends. Good ideas without integration are loose ends. Eventually, the mind protects itself. It slows down. It avoids. It shuts down. This is not laziness. It is cognitive self-preservation. Zettelkasten addresses this at the level of integration.

The Core Habits
You do not need specialised software. You do not need a numbering system that requires a tutorial. You need three habits.

  • First, capture one idea per note. Not a summary of a chapter. One idea.
  • Second, write it in your own words. If you cannot rephrase it, you have not understood it.
  • Third, connect it to an existing idea. Ask where it fits. Does it support something you already believe? Challenge it? Extend it?

That is the method. It is deceptively modest. But modest systems tend to last longer.

A Full Example From Start to Finish
Let us make this concrete.

  • You read a sentence: “Clarity reduces anxiety more effectively than motivation.”
  • Instead of highlighting it and moving on, you pause. You create a note: Clarity reduces anxiety more effectively than motivation because uncertainty creates cognitive tension.
  • That is your thinking note. Now you ask: what does this connect to? Perhaps you already have a note that says: When I feel stuck, I look for motivation instead of defining the next specific action. You link them.
  • A week later, while reviewing your notes, you see another idea about decision fatigue. You connect that too.
  • Now three ideas form a cluster. Clarity. Motivation. Decision fatigue.
  • You are no longer collecting quotes. You are tracing patterns in your own behaviour.

This is where the system begins to feel alive.

Using Trello Without Turning It Into a Task List
If you already use Trello for weekly lists and schedules, you can adapt it.

  • Create a separate board purely for thinking notes. Not tasks. Not projects.
  • Each card contains one idea. The card title holds the core claim. The description expands slightly if needed, but do not turn it into an essay.
  • Avoid workflow columns. This is not “To Do,” “Doing, “Done.” That structure encourages completion, not connection.
  • Instead, let all cards live in a single list, or at most a few thematic lists. The power lies in linking.
  • When one idea connects to another, paste the related card’s link inside it. Over time, certain cards will accumulate multiple links. Those are anchor ideas. Revisit them.
  • If you find yourself colour-coding excessively or reorganising columns frequently, pause. You may be drifting back into productivity theatre.
  • The method is not about visual control. It is about intellectual continuity.

Apple Notes works just as well. Paper works just as well. The tool is secondary. The discipline is primary.

Managing Overload in Practical Terms

  • If your overwhelm leads to shutdown, start small.
  • Limit what you process. Do not try to convert every article into notes. Choose selectively.
  • Process immediately. When something feels meaningful, write the note at once. Delayed processing becomes a backlog.
  • Keep notes short. If a note feels long, it probably contains more than one idea. Split it.
  • Review weekly. Not to admire your collection, but to add links. The connections are the system.
  • Most importantly, reduce passive saving. A saved link you never process is mental clutter disguised as organisation.

Where People Complicate It
There are predictable traps.

  • One is turning Zettelkasten into an elaborate digital setup. Complex numbering schemes. Hierarchies. Colour systems. The original method used index cards in a box. If your setup feels heavier than that, simplify.
  • Another trap is perfectionism. Waiting until you fully understand something before writing a note. Understanding often emerges through writing.
  • A third trap is hoarding notes without linking them. A large archive of disconnected thoughts is not a network. It is a storage room. The method only works if ideas are in conversation.

A Brief Comparison
You may have heard of PARA, which organises information into Projects, Areas, Resources and Archives. That system is excellent for managing tasks and responsibilities. Zettelkasten is different. It does not organise by category. It organises by relationship. Commonplace books, historically, collected quotations and passages worth remembering. Zettelkasten moves one step further. It requires interpretation and linkage. If PARA manages your external life, Zettelkasten manages your internal thinking. They can coexist. But they serve different purposes.

System or Boundary?
Before adopting any method, ask yourself a harder question. Is your overwhelm coming from poor integration or from excessive input? If you are constantly consuming news, scrolling social media, or signing up for courses you do not complete, no note-taking system will solve that. Zettelkasten assumes selectivity. It deepens what you choose to engage with. It does not filter for you. If what you need are boundaries, start there. Reduce input. If what you need is integration, build the slip box. Clarity about this distinction prevents the system from becoming another layer of noise.

A Gentle Acknowledgement of Shutdown
When overwhelm leads to shutdown, it can feel like failure. Especially for those who enjoy structure and systems. But shutdown is often the mind saying, enough unfinished loops. A small daily practice of integration can reduce those loops. One idea processed. One link made. That is manageable.

Over time, instead of feeling chased by information, you begin to recognise your own recurring themes. You see what you return to. You notice what truly matters to you. The volume outside may not decrease. But the internal noise often does.

A Reflective Closing
Information is not the same as understanding. In a time when knowledge is everywhere, depth requires intention. The Zettelkasten method is not about efficiency or optimisation. It is about continuity. It allows ideas to mature instead of disappearing into saved folders and forgotten links. You do not have to overhaul your digital life to begin. One idea is written clearly. One connection made deliberately. That may be enough to see whether this way of thinking suits you.

The Quiet Performance of Being Busy

There is a particular kind of tired that comes from work that is not especially hard, not especially meaningful, and yet somehow exhausting. You finish the day with a full calendar behind you and very little to show for it. You were present. You were responsive. You were busy. And still, something essential never quite got done.

This is where the idea of hey-hanging fits. Not laziness. Not slacking. Not disengagement. But a kind of performative busyness that fills the space where clarity, direction, or real demand should have been.

Most of us drift into it. Very few set out to.

Hey-hanging is what happens when work becomes more about appearing occupied than doing something that actually requires thought. It is the safe middle ground between effort and avoidance. You look busy. You feel busy. You stay just active enough to avoid questions, including your own.

It is tempting to frame this as a personal failing. A lack of discipline. A modern attention problem. But that reading is too simple and, frankly, unfair. Hey-hanging does not flourish in well-designed systems. It thrives in environments where expectations are unclear, priorities shift without warning, and visibility is rewarded more than substance. In other words, hey-hanging is not the cause. It is the symptom.

When busyness becomes a form of safety
Most people do not choose performative busyness because it is easy. They choose it because it feels safer than the alternatives. Deep work costs energy. It requires thinking time, uninterrupted space, and a tolerance for uncertainty. It also makes you visible in a different way. When you commit to work that matters, you risk getting it wrong. You risk disagreement. You risk silence while you think.

Hey-hanging, on the other hand, offers immediate protection. Emails answered quickly. Meetings attended. Documents opened and adjusted. Tasks that can be completed, ticked off, and shown if needed. It creates the appearance of momentum, even when the direction is unclear.

In poorly designed work environments, this behaviour is often quietly reinforced. People who are constantly available are seen as committed. People who respond quickly are seen as reliable. People who ask fewer difficult questions are seen as cooperative. Under these conditions, hey-hanging becomes less about avoidance and more about survival.

The stressors that feed the cycle
Two stressors sit at the heart of this pattern: cognitive overload and unclear expectations.

Cognitive overload is not simply about having too much to do. It is about having too many things competing for attention without a clear hierarchy. When everything is labelled urgent, nothing really is. The brain responds by defaulting to what feels manageable. Smaller tasks. Familiar actions. Work that does not require heavy thinking.

Unclear expectations make this worse. If success is poorly defined, people will optimise for visibility instead. If outcomes are vague, effort becomes the proxy. If priorities change often, committing deeply to any one piece of work feels risky.

In such environments, hey-hanging is not irrational. It is adaptive. It allows people to stay afloat without burning through what little cognitive capacity they have left. This is why simply telling people to “focus” or “work smarter” rarely helps. You cannot concentrate your way out of a system that punishes depth and rewards constant motion.

Why calling it laziness misses the point
There is a moral tone that often creeps into conversations about productivity. Busy but unproductive people are framed as inefficient or unserious. Stress is sometimes treated as a badge of honour, while ease is treated with suspicion. This framing does real damage.

First, it ignores the reality that much modern work is badly designed. Roles expand quietly. Responsibilities blur. Meetings multiply without a clear purpose. Decisions are deferred upwards or sideways. The individual is left to manage the resulting mess alone.

Second, it assumes that effort should always look a certain way. Quiet thinking, slow synthesis, and deliberate pacing rarely read as “hard work” from the outside. Yet these are often the most demanding forms of labour.

Third, it places the burden entirely on the individual to self-regulate in systems that actively undermine regulation.

Hey-hanging is not laziness. It is what happens when people are asked to function without clarity, trust, or adequate support. That does not mean individuals have no agency. It does mean the conversation needs to be more honest.

The uneasy space between responsibility and structure
It is comfortable to blame organisations. It is also incomplete. Individuals do make choices within constraints. We all recognise moments when we choose easier visible work over harder invisible work. We know what it feels like to tidy the edges instead of addressing the centre. Sometimes we stay busy because being still would force a reckoning we are not ready for.

The truth sits in the uneasy space between personal responsibility and structural failure. You can acknowledge that your workload is badly designed and still notice when you are avoiding deeper engagement. You can critique management practices and still ask yourself what you are optimising for each day. These things are not opposites. In fact, holding both perspectives is often what allows change to begin.

Burnout does not always look dramatic
Burnout is often described as a collapse. Exhaustion. Tears. A breaking point. More often, it looks like this instead: functional, competent, disengaged. You do what is asked. You respond. You attend. You do not care very much. In this state, hey-hanging becomes more frequent. Not because you do not want to contribute, but because your capacity for deeper effort has been eroded over time. Thinking feels expensive. The initiative feels risky. You default to what keeps you afloat.

This is especially common among high-functioning people. Those who are used to being capable, reliable, and self-directed. They adapt quietly. They absorb ambiguity. They keep going long after the work has stopped making sense. From the outside, they look fine. From the inside, something has flattened.

Productivity theatre and fake urgency
One of the more corrosive features of modern work is productivity theatre. The appearance of action without the substance of progress. Endless check-ins. Meetings that exist because they always have. Urgent requests that are not actually urgent. Last-minute changes that signal importance rather than necessity.

Fake urgency trains people to stay reactive. When everything is framed as critical, there is no space to distinguish what truly matters. People learn to move quickly rather than think well. Over time, this erodes trust. In the system, in leadership, and in one’s own judgment. Hey-hanging thrives in this environment because it keeps you responsive without requiring belief. Calling this out is not anti-work. It is pro-sense.

What can individuals realistically do?
It would be dishonest to suggest that individuals can fix systemic problems on their own. They cannot. But there are small, practical shifts that can reduce the pull of hey-hanging and create pockets of better work.

One is naming the real work. Not in grand mission statements, but in simple terms. What would meaningful progress actually look like this week? What would be different if this piece of work went well?

Another is noticing where visibility has replaced value. Which tasks make you look busy but move nothing forward? Which ones require more effort but less display? This is not about doing less. It is about choosing more honestly.

A third is setting gentler boundaries around cognitive load. Fewer context switches where possible. Shorter windows for shallow tasks. Protecting even small amounts of thinking time can change the texture of a workday.

And sometimes, it is about acknowledging limits. There are environments where depth is simply not supported. In those cases, the most self-respecting choice may be to stop over-investing emotionally, or to plan an exit over time.

These are not dramatic fixes. They are small acts of alignment.

What organisations need to confront
If hey-hanging is widespread, it is worth asking why. Are roles clearly defined, or do they rely on individual interpretation? Are priorities stable, or constantly shifting? Is thinking time respected, or treated as unproductive? Are people rewarded for outcomes, or for availability? Bad management often hides behind busyness. So does indecision. When leaders are unclear, teams fill the gap with activity.

Reducing hey-hanging at an organisational level requires courage. Fewer meetings. Clearer ownership. Honest conversations about what is no longer needed. Trusting people to work without constant proof. This is not about squeezing more output from people. It is about designing work that does not require constant performance to feel legitimate.

Asking better questions
Perhaps the most useful thing this concept offers is a set of questions rather than answers.

  • What am I actually working towards right now?
  • What would change if I slowed down instead of speeding up?
  • Who benefits from my staying visibly busy?
  • What am I avoiding by staying occupied?
  • What would real effort look like here?

These are not comfortable questions. They are also not accusations. They are invitations to notice.

Not anti-work, not anti-effort
It is important to be clear about what this argument is not. It is not a rejection of work. It is not a call to disengage. It is not an excuse for doing less than you are capable of. It is a refusal to confuse motion with meaning. Effort matters. Care matters. Contribution matters. But effort without direction becomes noise, and care without structure becomes exhaustion. Hey-hanging is what happens when people are left to manage that gap alone.

A quieter re-design
The alternative to hey-hanging is not constant intensity. It is not heroic productivity. It is quieter, and in many ways harder. It asks for clarity instead of urgency. Trust instead of surveillance. Depth instead of display.

At an individual level, it asks for honesty about capacity and intention. At an organisational level, it asks for better design rather than better coping.

Most of us will still hey-hang from time to time. That is human. The goal is not purity. It is awareness. If this article does anything, let it be this: to help people recognise that feeling busy and feeling useful are not the same thing, and that the gap between them is not always a personal failure. Sometimes, it is simply a sign that the work itself needs to change.

In My Hands Today…

Trump Passion in the Quest for Work You Love – Cal Newport

In this eye-opening account, Cal Newport debunks the long-held belief that “follow your passion” is good advice.

Not only is the cliché flawed—preexisting passions are rare and have little to do with how most people end up loving their work—but it can also be dangerous, leading to anxiety and chronic job hopping.

After making his case against passion, Newport sets out on a quest to discover the reality of how people end up loving what they do. Spending time with organic farmers, venture capitalists, screenwriters, freelance computer programmers, and others who admitted to deriving great satisfaction from their work, Newport uncovers the strategies they used and the pitfalls they avoided in developing their compelling careers.

Matching your job to a preexisting passion does not matter, he reveals. Passion comes after you put in the hard work to become excellent at something valuable, not before. In other words, what you do for a living is much less important than how you do it.

With a title taken from the comedian Steve Martin, who once said his advice for aspiring entertainers was to “be so good they can’t ignore you,” Cal Newport’s clearly written manifesto is mandatory reading for anyone fretting about what to do with their life, or frustrated by their current job situation and eager to find a fresh new way to take control of their livelihood. He provides an evidence-based blueprint for creating work you love.

So Good They Can’t Ignore You will change the way we think about our careers, happiness, and the crafting of a remarkable life.

In My Hands Today…

Dopamine Detox : A Short Guide to Remove Distractions and Train Your Brain to Do Hard Things – Thibaut Meurisse, edited by Kerry J. Donovan

Do you keep procrastinating? Do you feel restless and unable to focus on your work? Do you have trouble getting excited about major goals?

If so, you might need a dopamine detox.

In today’s world, where distractions are everywhere, the ability to focus has become more and more difficult to achieve. We are constantly being stimulated, feeling restless, often without knowing why.

When the time comes to work, we suddenly find an excess of other things to do. Instead of working toward our goals, we go for a walk, grab a coffee, or check our emails. Everything seems like a great idea—everything except the very things we should be doing.

Do you recognize yourself in the above situation?

If so, don’t worry. You’re simply overstimulated.

Dopamine Detox will help you lower your level of stimulation and regain focus in 48 hours or less, so that you can tackle your key tasks.

More specifically, in Dopamine Detox you’ll discover:

  • what dopamine is and how it works
  • the main benefits of completing a dopamine detox
  • 3 simple steps to implement a successful detox in the next 48 hours
  • practical exercises to eliminate distractions and boost your focus
  • simple tools and techniques to avoid overstimulation and help you stay focused, and much more.