Why Some Friendships Last Decades and Others Fade Quietly

Some friendships survive continents, marriages, career changes, illnesses, and years of silence. Then some friendships disappear almost without notice. No fight. No betrayal. No dramatic final conversation. One day, the messages simply stop. The annual birthday greeting becomes a reaction emoji. Eventually, even that disappears. Most people have experienced both. 

Modern life likes to celebrate friendship in loud ways. Television gives us tightly knit circles that remain inseparable for decades. Social media gives us endless declarations about “besties,” “tribes,” and “found family.” Yet real friendship often looks far less cinematic. It ebbs and flows. It changes shape. Some relationships deepen with time while others quietly dissolve under the weight of adulthood, distance, shifting values, or simple neglect.

The uncomfortable truth may be that not all friendships are built to survive forever. Some exist because of circumstance rather than deep emotional compatibility. Others endure because two people keep choosing each other long after convenience disappears. The difference between the two is not always obvious while the friendship is happening.

One of the easiest ways to mistake proximity for intimacy is during youth. Schools, universities, neighbourhoods, workplaces, hobby groups, religious communities, and even military service create environments where people spend large amounts of time together. Shared routines create familiarity, and familiarity can feel like permanence. It is only later, when the structure holding the friendship together disappears, that its true strength becomes visible.

This is why certain friendships fade almost immediately after a life transition. A workplace friend who felt indispensable during daily lunch breaks may vanish within months of a resignation. A university friendship built around assignments and campus life may struggle once careers, partners, and children enter the picture. Sometimes there is no conflict at all. There is simply nothing left holding the relationship in place.

That does not necessarily mean the friendship was fake. Temporary friendships can still be meaningful. A person may accompany someone through a difficult season, a lonely phase, or a transformative period of life without remaining in the story forever. Modern culture sometimes treats every fading friendship as a failure, but human relationships have always been shaped by time and circumstance.

Still, some friendships survive these transitions remarkably well. These are often the friendships people describe as “picking up where we left off.” Months or even years may pass with little communication, yet the emotional rhythm returns almost instantly when the two people reconnect. There is no awkwardness about the silence because the friendship does not depend entirely on constant contact.

Shared history plays a powerful role here. Long friendships accumulate layers. There is comfort in being known by someone who remembers earlier versions of a person. Old friends remember awkward teenage years, failed relationships, family histories, youthful ambitions, and forgotten dreams. They carry memories that newer friendships cannot replicate. In an age where identity is constantly curated and updated online, something is stabilising about people who remember who someone was before the carefully managed digital persona emerged.

Yet shared history alone is not enough. Many people maintain old friendships out of nostalgia, even when the present-day compatibility has faded. The reality is that people change. Priorities shift. Political beliefs evolve. Financial circumstances diverge. Personal values harden or soften over time. A friendship that felt natural at twenty may feel strained at forty because the two individuals no longer see the world in similar ways.

This emotional imbalance is often underestimated in discussions about friendship. One person may continue investing deeply in the relationship while the other slowly disengages. Sometimes resentment grows quietly beneath the surface. In other cases, jealousy creeps in when lives begin moving in dramatically different directions. Watching a friend achieve professional success, financial comfort, marriage, or personal fulfilment can trigger complicated emotions, especially if someone feels stuck in their own life.

Few people openly admit this because friendship is supposed to feel generous and uncomplicated. Yet long-term friendships are not immune to envy or comparison. In fact, they may be especially vulnerable to it because friends often begin life from similar starting points. When adulthood produces sharply different outcomes, emotional tension can quietly build. This is one reason adulthood can be surprisingly hostile to deep friendship.

Childhood and youth naturally create spaces for friendship. Adulthood often fragments them. Careers consume time and emotional energy. Marriage and parenthood shift priorities. Migration scatters social circles across cities and countries. Exhaustion becomes normal. Even maintaining immediate family relationships can feel demanding, leaving little room for the sustained effort friendship sometimes requires.

At the same time, modern adulthood has also normalised busyness as identity. Many people proudly describe themselves as overwhelmed. Social calendars become transactional. Free time becomes scarce. Emotional availability shrinks. Friendship, unlike work or family obligations, often becomes the first thing sacrificed because it lacks formal structure and consequences.

There is also the question of maintenance. Some people dislike applying that word to friendship because it sounds clinical or transactional. Friendship is supposed to feel natural, not managed. Yet most enduring relationships require deliberate care. Not necessarily constant messaging or daily updates, but gestures of attention. Checking in during difficult periods, remembering important moments, and making time despite inconvenience.

The friendships that survive decades are rarely accidental. They endure because both people continue making small choices in favour of the relationship. One person sends the message first. Another makes time for a call despite a busy schedule. Someone books the ticket for a reunion. Someone forgives delayed replies instead of keeping score. These actions may seem minor individually, but together they form the quiet architecture of long-term friendship.

Technology complicates this further. Social media has simultaneously preserved friendships and diluted them. It is now possible to maintain loose awareness of hundreds of people without speaking to most of them directly. Someone may know where an old school friend travelled last summer, what they ate for dinner, and which political opinions they currently hold without having had a meaningful conversation in years.

This creates the illusion of connection. The modern friendship ecosystem is full of passive interaction masquerading as intimacy. Birthday wishes appear because Facebook sends reminders. Instagram reactions substitute for actual conversation. WhatsApp groups remain technically active despite containing people who would probably never meet individually anymore.

Many people recognise this phenomenon instinctively. The annual flood of social media birthday greetings often feels emotionally different from a message sent by someone who remembered the date without digital assistance. In some ways, technology has made remembering easier while making connections thinner.

Yet social media is not entirely to blame. For migrants, expats, and globally dispersed families, digital communication has preserved relationships that earlier generations might have lost completely. 

Long-distance friendship today is far more sustainable than it once was. Video calls, group chats, voice notes, and shared online spaces allow people to remain emotionally present across continents.

Still, there is a difference between accessibility and closeness. Some friendships survive because there is genuine emotional substance beneath the communication tools. Others survive merely as digital residue. They exist because nobody formally ended them. This may explain why fading friendships can hurt more than dramatic endings. A betrayal at least provides clarity. There is a moment of rupture, a reason to grieve, a narrative that explains what happened. Quietly fading friendships offer no such resolution. The relationship simply weakens slowly until one day both people realise they no longer really know each other.

There is often guilt attached to this process, too. People wonder whether they should have tried harder. Whether adulthood made them selfish. Whether they abandoned someone who once mattered deeply.

Yet friendship endings rarely receive the emotional recognition given to romantic breakups. Society has rituals for divorce, heartbreak, and family conflict. Friendship grief is often treated as trivial or immature. Adults are expected to move on quietly. This can make friendship loss strangely isolating.

Losing a long-time friend can feel like losing part of one’s personal history. Certain memories become inaccessible because the other witness to them is gone. Particular versions of oneself disappear with the relationship. Unlike romantic breakups, friendship endings also lack clear social language. Few people say, “We broke up as friends.” Instead, they say things like, “We lost touch.” The phrase sounds harmless. Often it is not.

Cultural attitudes also shape how friendships are expressed and maintained. In many Asian cultures, friendship may operate with less overt emotional language compared to Western ideals of constant vulnerability and verbal affirmation. People may not openly discuss feelings or maintain frequent communication, yet still consider the friendship deeply important.

Indian social culture complicates this further because personal boundaries often operate differently. Friendship networks can remain highly involved in one another’s lives across decades, with expectations of emotional and practical support extending well into adulthood. At the same time, these close-knit dynamics can sometimes create pressure, obligation, or difficulty adapting to changing personal identities.

Generational differences matter too. Younger generations are growing up in an environment where communication is constant, but attention is fragmented. Friendships now exist across multiple digital platforms simultaneously. Group chats create ongoing low-level interaction, but not necessarily emotional depth. Online communities can provide intense feelings of belonging while also remaining surprisingly transient.

Older generations often formed friendships around physical presence and repeated in-person interaction. Younger people may form meaningful bonds entirely online. Neither model is inherently superior, but they shape expectations differently. Constant digital accessibility may create pressure for continuous responsiveness, while also making silence feel more loaded than it once did.

At the heart of all this is a difficult reality: friendship is both durable and fragile. Some relationships survive extraordinary stretches of time because they are rooted in mutual respect, shared history, emotional generosity, and adaptability. Others disappear because the conditions sustaining them quietly changed.

Neither outcome necessarily invalidates what existed before. There is perhaps a tendency to over-romanticise lifelong friendship. Popular culture celebrates the idea that true friendship should remain unchanged forever. Real life is more complicated. People outgrow one another. Lives diverge. Emotional needs evolve. Sometimes the kindest thing a friendship can do is remain meaningful in memory rather than force itself into an artificial permanence.

At the same time, modern life may genuinely be eroding some of the conditions that allow friendship to thrive. Constant busyness, geographic mobility, digital distraction, and hyper-individualistic lifestyles leave less room for sustained emotional investment. Friendship often survives in the margins of life rather than at its centre.

And yet, despite all this, certain friendships endure. Perhaps what separates them is not frequency of communication or dramatic declarations of loyalty. Perhaps it is something quieter. A willingness to make room for change without abandoning the relationship entirely. An ability to survive silence without resentment. The understanding that friendship, like people themselves, evolves over time.

The strongest friendships are often not the loudest ones. They are the ones that remain steady beneath the interruptions of adulthood. The friend who remembers the difficult years. The one who can speak honestly without performance. The one who reappears after a long silence and still feels familiar.

Not every friendship is meant to last forever. But the ones that do often reveal something important about human connection itself. That closeness is not built only through proximity, convenience, or constant communication. It is built through accumulated trust, shared memory, repeated choice, and the quiet decision to remain present in one another’s lives even as everything else changes.

In the end, perhaps that is why some friendships survive decades while others fade quietly. Some relationships are carried by circumstance. Others are carried by intention.

In My Hands Today…

Divided: Why We’re Living in an Age of Walls – Tim Marshall

We feel more divided than ever.
This riveting analysis tells you why.

Walls are going up. Nationalism and identity politics are on the rise once more. Thousands of miles of fences and barriers have been erected in the past ten years, and they are redefining our political landscape.

There are many reasons why we erect walls, because we are divided in many ways: wealth, race, religion, politics. In Europe the ruptures of the past decade threaten not only European unity, but in some countries liberal democracy itself. In China, the Party’s need to contain the divisions wrought by capitalism will define the nation’s future. In the USA the rationale for the Mexican border wall taps into the fear that the USA will no longer be a white majority country in the course of this century.

Understanding what has divided us, past and present, is essential to understanding much of what’s going on in the world today. Covering China; the USA; Israel and Palestine; the Middle East; the Indian Subcontinent; Africa; Europe and the UK, bestselling author Tim Marshall presents a gripping and unflinching analysis of the fault lines that will shape our world for years to come.

Are We Becoming Too Busy to Be Kind?

Some questions sound simple until we sit with them. Are we becoming too busy to be kind? At first glance, the answer seems obvious. Yes, of course we are. Look around. Everyone is rushing. Everyone is tired. Everyone has deadlines, bills, errands, worries, children, ageing parents, work messages, health issues, school matters, and a phone that never really lets them rest.

But the question is not only whether we are busy. Most of us are. The real question is what that busyness is doing to us.

Is it making us less patient? Less thoughtful? Less willing to pause? Less likely to notice someone else’s discomfort? Less able to help unless it is convenient, scheduled, and does not interfere with our own carefully planned lives?

There was a time when, if something happened in public, the instinct might have been to run towards the person who needed help. Today, too often, the instinct seems to be to take out a phone. A fall, an argument, an accident, an uncomfortable scene, all of it becomes content before it becomes concern. There is something deeply unsettling about that. The urge to record has begun to compete with the urge to assist. In some cases, it has replaced it.

Of course, not everyone behaves this way. People still help. Strangers still step forward. Quiet goodness still exists all around us. But there is also a growing hesitation. Why get involved? What if I get blamed? What if this becomes complicated? What if someone records me? What if it is not my problem?

And so we look away.

Perhaps people have not become less kind. Perhaps they have become more tired, more afraid, and more overwhelmed. Kindness may still exist, but it is buried under stress, deadlines, financial worries, caregiving responsibilities, commuting fatigue, and the mental load of modern life. The heart may still be soft, but the day is hard. And when the day is hard for too long, softness begins to feel like a luxury.

To me, kindness is not about grand gestures. It is not about public charity, dramatic declarations, or social media posts about how compassionate one is. Kindness is far simpler and far more difficult. It is being a decent human being. It is helping when one can. It is being thoughtful. It is treating everyone around us with the same basic dignity, regardless of their social or financial status.

That last part matters.

Because very often, the measure of our kindness is not how we treat those above us, or those we want to impress. It is how we treat those who have no power over us. Service staff. Cleaners. Domestic helpers. Delivery riders. Security guards. Receptionists. Cashiers. The person clearing our tray. The person answering our call. The person who cannot talk back because their job depends on remaining polite.

It is easy to be charming to someone important. It takes character to be respectful to someone who is tired, underpaid, and invisible to most people.

And yet, this is where unkindness often shows itself. A sharp tone. A dismissive gesture. No eye contact. No thank you. An assumption that because someone is serving us, they are somehow beneath us. It is as if social or economic hierarchy gives people permission to forget basic decency.

It does not. Kindness is not kindness if it is selective. If we reserve courtesy only for those we consider our equals, then what we are practising is not kindness. It is social calculation.

I first moved to Singapore many years ago, and some of my earliest memories of public life here are complicated ones. I remember older Chinese passengers not sitting next to me on the bus or train, even when there was space. I remember people tapping the seat after I vacated it, as though removing my traces. These were small moments. Nobody shouted. Nobody said anything directly. But small unkindnesses can stay with us precisely because they are small. They make us question whether we imagined them. They leave a faint bruise.

At work too, unkindness often arrives in quiet forms. A message ignored, a reply delayed without explanation, someone pretending not to see your contribution, or a person in authority using silence as a weapon. No single incident may seem large enough to complain about, but together they create an atmosphere. Busy workplaces can become unkind workplaces, not always because people are cruel, but because pressure makes everyone transactional.

Kindness at work is not about being sweet all the time. It is about clear communication. It is about not dumping urgent work unnecessarily. It is about giving credit. Respecting people’s time. Saying thank you. Not weaponising hierarchy. Assuming good intent until proven otherwise. These are not soft things. They are the foundation of a healthy workplace.

But we do not always value them. Today’s culture praises productivity, ambition, speed, confidence, hustle, excellence, leadership, success, and resilience. These are not bad qualities. But where does kindness sit among them? Is it praised? Rewarded? Promoted? Or is it seen as soft, weak, inefficient, naive, not strategic enough?

Too often, kind people are taken advantage of. They are expected to absorb more, forgive more, stretch more, and understand more. Their kindness becomes part of the system’s convenience. This is why kindness also needs boundaries. Being kind does not mean becoming a doormat. It does not mean tolerating disrespect. It does not mean saying yes when every part of you is exhausted. True kindness includes honesty. It includes respect for oneself too.

That may be the hardest form of kindness for many of us.

We speak often about being kind to others, but what about being kind to ourselves? Many of us are far harsher inwardly than we would ever be to another person. I know I am guilty of this. When things do not go my way, I can very quickly slip into self-blame. I think of all the things I did wrong, all the ways I could have done better, all the moments where I was not perfect enough. It is exhausting, this private courtroom we carry within us.

And perhaps that is part of the problem. People who are constantly unkind to themselves may have very little softness left for others. If our inner voice is always impatient, critical, and unforgiving, it becomes harder to speak gently outwardly. The tone leaks. The pressure spills.

Still, this cannot become an excuse. “I am stressed” may explain unkindness, but it does not erase its effect.

We all know this because we have all done it. I try to be conscious about how I treat people, but I am sure there have been times when I have been inadvertently unkind. And if I am honest, I am probably most unkind to those closest to me: S, then my children, then my helper. I have also been unkind to my parents and my sister. I apologise when I realise it, and I try to walk back. But the truth remains. We are often least guarded with the people who love us most.

Perhaps because we know they will forgive us. Perhaps because we assume they will understand. Perhaps because home is where the mask comes off, and unfortunately, sometimes the manners come off with it.

This is a painful thing to admit, but an important one. Any essay on kindness that only points outward becomes too easy. The rude stranger, the impatient commuter, the harsh boss, the ungrateful customer, they are all convenient examples. But the real test of kindness is not only how I behave when I am rested, admired, and in public. It is how I behave when I am tired, disappointed, anxious, and at home.

Motherhood has taught me this in unexpected ways. I became more patient as a mother, so much so that my father once noticed it with surprise. I suppose having twins does that to you. When there are two babies, two sets of needs, two cries, two schedules, two small humans depending on you at once, something in you either hardens or expands. For me, it expanded my patience.

I have often been more patient with BB and GG than with many others in my life. And now that my parents are older, I find myself more patient with them too. Age reverses many roles quietly. The people who once waited for us now need us to wait for them.

Kindness is harder when one is tired. There is no point pretending otherwise. But I also believe that if someone is intrinsically kind, that quality remains, even under pressure. It may wobble. It may fray at the edges. But it does not disappear. Real kindness is not a mood. It is a muscle. It is also, perhaps, like a bank account. The more we deposit into it, the more it grows. A small act here, a patient response there, a thoughtful pause, a decision not to snap, a decision to help, all of it adds up.

What would happen if everyone around us became just ten percent kinder? Not saintly. Not self-sacrificing. Just ten percent more patient. Ten percent more thoughtful. Ten percent less likely to assume the worst. Ten percent more willing to say, “Take your time.” Would we not live in a better society?

Singapore is an interesting place to think about this question because it is such an efficient society. Things work, trains arrive, queues move and systems are clear. Time is respected. There is much to admire in this. But efficiency can sometimes look like coldness, even when it is not intended that way. When everyone is moving fast, softness can seem like delay. Pausing can feel like obstruction. The person who needs extra time becomes an inconvenience.

Singaporeans are often kind in practical ways. There are people who give up seats on buses and trains, neighbours who help without fuss, colleagues who cover for one another quietly, strangers who step in when needed. But perhaps, as a society, there can be impatience in emotional spaces. A discomfort with messiness. A preference for order over tenderness. A tendency to move quickly past anything that slows the system down.

India, at least the India I grew up in, offered a different model. Not necessarily better in every way, but different. Growing up, it was common to go into a neighbour’s house to drink water or wait if one’s parents were not home. My parents could travel and leave my sister and me alone, secure in the knowledge that neighbours would help, feed us, and be there in an emergency. I remember a neighbour picking me up from the station when my parents could not.

That kind of neighbourliness was ordinary then. Not heroic. Not worthy of an announcement. Just what people did.

I do not know if that India exists in the same way today. Cities have changed. Lives have changed. Trust has changed. People are busier, more guarded, more private, perhaps with reason. The old neighbourhood could be kind, but it could also be intrusive. Warmth came with unsolicited advice. Help came with commentary. Everyone knew your business, sometimes before you did. Still, there was a human net. Imperfect, nosy, sometimes annoying, but real.

Today, in many cities across the world, that net has thinned. We may live closer together physically, but further apart emotionally. We know the delivery rider’s location on an app, but not our neighbour’s name. We can track parcels, flights, investments, and calories, but still fail to notice when someone near us is struggling.

Online life has complicated this further. Social media has made people more visible, but not necessarily more compassionate. It has made it easier to perform concern and harder to practise it quietly. Outrage is instant. Judgment is instant. Cancelling is instant. Mockery is instant. People assume the worst with remarkable speed. Anonymity gives courage to cruelty. And the desire to go viral can turn someone else’s pain into opportunity.

Perhaps social media has not made people unkind. Perhaps it has simply made visible what people always thought privately. But visibility changes behaviour. When every act can become content, kindness itself can become performative. The public declaration begins to matter more than the private action.

This is why I respect small private kindness most. The kindness no one sees. The colleague who covers for someone without announcing it. The neighbour who helps without keeping score. The stranger who gives up a seat. The person who replies gently when they could have been sharp. The one who treats the cleaner and the CEO with the same courtesy. The friend who remembers a detail. The family member who notices tiredness before it becomes collapse.

Everyday decency matters more to me than grand gestures. Consistency matters more than spectacle. Action matters more than words, though words too can heal when they are sincere.

Who taught me kindness? Many people. My family. My neighbours. Books. The world I grew up in, where values like Athithi Devo Bhava, the guest is God, were part of the cultural fabric. At its best, this idea is rooted in generosity and hospitality. It teaches us to make space for another person. To feed, welcome, and care. Of course, like all traditions, it can also become performative or burdensome, especially for the women expected to do all the feeding and welcoming. But at its heart lies something beautiful: the idea that another person’s comfort matters.

Maybe that is what kindness really is. The belief that another person’s experience matters.

It does not always require a lot of time. Sometimes kindness happens in a second. Holding the lift. Letting someone go ahead. Saying thank you. Not honking. Smiling at someone who looks nervous. Replying to a message with care. Giving someone the benefit of the doubt.

But deeper kindness does require attention. And attention is what busyness steals first.

When we are too busy, we stop noticing. We stop noticing the helper who looks tired. The parent who is repeating a story because they want connection, not because they have forgotten they told us before. The child who is quieter than usual. The spouse who has done ten invisible things before breakfast. The colleague who is overwhelmed. The cashier who has dealt with rude customers all day. The cleaner whose work makes our comfort possible.

The opposite of kindness is not always cruelty. Sometimes it is simply not noticing.

And this is where busyness becomes dangerous. Not because having a full life is wrong. Most of us cannot opt out of responsibility. We have to work, care, plan, earn, cook, commute, manage, and keep going. But if we are so busy that we no longer have time to be decent, then something has gone wrong. If our schedules leave no room for patience, our ambition no room for gentleness, our efficiency no room for humanity, then we have built lives that may function well but feel emotionally poor.

The world does not need more performative kindness. It needs more ordinary kindness. The unglamorous kind. The kind that does not photograph well. The kind that does not need applause. The kind that shows up in tone, timing, patience, respect, and restraint.

It means helping when we can. Not recording when someone needs assistance. Not turning away simply because “it is not our problem.” Not using “I’m busy” as a blanket excuse to avoid care, courtesy, or responsibility. Yes, genuine overwhelm is real. There are seasons when people are stretched beyond capacity. But the line between genuine overwhelm and careless self-importance is thin, and we cross it more easily than we admit.

Maybe the question is not only whether we are too busy to be kind.

Maybe the question is whether we are willing to become less busy in the ways that matter. Less busy judging. Less busy proving ourselves. Less busy performing goodness. Less busy chasing productivity at the cost of tenderness. Less busy assuming that our urgency is more important than someone else’s dignity.

A kinder life does not require grand transformation. It may begin with a pause. A breath before replying. A thank you. An apology. A decision to help. A decision not to humiliate. A decision to treat the person serving us as a person, not a function. A decision to be gentler with those at home, because love should not have to survive our worst tone simply because it can.

Kindness matters because it makes the world a better place. That sounds almost too simple, but simple truths often are. A kinder world is not built only by policies, institutions, or public campaigns, though those matter too. It is built in kitchens, trains, offices, hospital corridors, school gates, WhatsApp messages, hawker centres, lifts, and living rooms.

It is built when we notice.

Perhaps we are not becoming too busy to be kind. Not yet. But we are busy enough that kindness now requires more intention than before. It has to be chosen. Practised. Protected. Passed on.

And maybe that is where we begin. Not by trying to become saints. That would be unbearable for everyone involved. But by becoming ten percent kinder. Ten percent slower to judge. Ten percent quicker to help. Ten percent more aware of the people around us.

It may not change the whole world at once.

But it will change the world immediately around us. And that is not a small thing.

2026 Week 39 Update

This week’s quote by American scientist, meditation teacher and professor emeritus of medicine at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Jon Kabat-Zinn, is an invitation to stop fighting reality, even if only for a moment. Much of our inner tension comes from believing that something should be different. The situation should have worked out another way. Someone should have behaved differently. We should be more successful, calmer, happier or further along than we are. While wanting change is perfectly natural, constantly measuring the present against an imagined version of how things should be can prevent us from experiencing what is actually happening.

Kabat-Zinn isn’t suggesting that we become passive or stop trying to improve our circumstances. Acceptance is not the same as resignation. We can acknowledge, This is where I am right now, while still deciding where we would like to go next. In fact, seeing the present clearly often allows us to respond more wisely because we are no longer using our energy to deny or resist it. The second half of the quote may be even harder. Allowing ourselves to be exactly as we are means temporarily putting aside self-judgement. We don’t have to fix every flaw, resolve every uncertainty or become a better version of ourselves before deciding that we are worthy of kindness. Sometimes peace begins with something surprisingly simple: stopping the argument with the present moment.

This week felt like a lesson in turning thought into structure. So much of what I worked on involved taking something large, complicated or slightly nebulous and asking: What are we actually trying to achieve? How do we get there? And how will we know that what we’re doing is making a difference? Slowly, scattered ideas became frameworks, possibilities became plans, and information became something I could actually use. There was a lot of learning woven into the week too, the kind that makes me look differently at work I have already been doing and realise that sometimes the question isn’t simply whether something was accomplished, but what changed because of it. I suspect that distinction will stay with me long after the workshops, notes and spreadsheets have disappeared from immediate memory.

By the end of the week, there was also the satisfying feeling of having completed what I had set out to do, perhaps even a little earlier than expected. And then life provided its inevitable reminder that beautifully organised plans are only ever provisional. Something far more important needed attention, and everything else simply had to rearrange itself around it. Perhaps that’s what I’m taking away from this week. Structure matters, planning matters, measuring progress matters, but flexibility matters too. We can build systems, organise our days and carefully map the road ahead. Then life changes the itinerary without consulting us. And maybe the real measure of progress isn’t whether everything went according to plan. It’s discovering that*when it doesn’t, I can adjust the plan without losing myself in the process.

This week, in the Bhagavad Gita, in verse 2.48, most people think peace comes after success. Krishna teaches something far more radical. Peace comes from how we approach our work, not from the outcome of it. When we become attached to results, every success inflates us and every setback diminishes us. We begin living at the mercy of circumstances. This verse invites us to a different way of being. Give your best effort. Act with sincerity and commitment. Then release the need to control the outcome. Equanimity does not mean indifference. It means remaining grounded regardless of what happens. The strongest people are not those who never fail. They are those who remain steady whether they succeed or fail. In Krishna’s teaching, this balance is not merely wisdom. It is Yoga itself.

This week, I learned that when you have the courage to leave behind what’s no longer right for you, you also have the courage to move toward what’s aligned, even when it’s hidden behind the veil of uncertainty. No matter how heavy your thoughts or emotions may feel, keep trusting the process of life. What seems unbearable now will eventually become a chapter that leads you somewhere meaningful. It only takes one “yes” to begin a new adventure, one that has the power to transform your life in unexpected, magical ways. Keep going.

That’s all I have for you this week. Stay positive, stay safe and keep smiling!

In My Hands Today…

Raising Hare: A Memoir – Chloe Dalton

Imagine you could hold a baby hare and bottle-feed it. Imagine that it lived under your roof and lolloped around your bedroom at night, drumming on the duvet cover when it wanted your attention. Imagine that, over two years later, it still ran in from the fields when you called it and slept in your house for hours on end and gave birth to leverets in your study. For political advisor and speechwriter Chloe Dalton, who spent lockdown deep in the English countryside, far away from her usual busy London life, this became her unexpected reality.

In February 2021, Dalton stumbles upon a newborn hare—a leveret—that had been chased by a dog. Fearing for its life, she brings it home, only to discover how impossible it is to rear a wild hare, most of whom perish in captivity from either shock or starvation. Through trial and error, she learns to feed and care for the leveret with every intention of returning it to the wilderness. Instead, it becomes her constant companion, wandering the fields and woods at night and returning to Dalton’s house by day. Though Dalton feared that the hare would be preyed upon by foxes, stoats, feral cats, raptors, and even people, she never tried to restrict it to the house. Each time the hare leaves, Chloe knows she may never see it again. Yet she also understands that to confine it would be its own kind of death.

Raising Hare chronicles their journey together, while also taking a deep dive into the lives and nature of hares, and the way they have been viewed historically in art, literature, and folklore. We witness first-hand the joy at this extraordinary relationship between human and animal, which serves as a reminder that the best things, and most beautiful experiences, arise when we least expect them.